Menu
Close
.svg)
My mornings don’t start with meditation or mindful breathing -- they start with something far more reliable: coffee. I flip open my airtight jar of La Colombe, inhale like someone auditioning for a fragrance commercial, and scoop the grounds into my French press. Then comes the 200-degree water -- hot enough to extract flavor, not bitterness. And I let chemistry and patience take over. No percolators. No pods. Just immersion, steam, and the promise of becoming a functional human.
These days I drink my coffee with honey. Years ago, it was milk and sugar; now I’ve embraced a cleaner sweetness that lets the underlying flavor of the beans shine through. And somewhere between that first sip and the moment my neurons finally agree to clock in, I often find myself doing something I genuinely enjoy: reading medical literature.
Because I work in the pharma world, I’m constantly exposed to clinical data and new research; but let’s be honest, I’d nerd out on this stuff regardless. There’s something genuinely fun about drinking my French press coffee while diving into updates on AI, robotic surgery, gene or cell therapy...or whatever cutting-edge medical breakthrough people are talking about that week.
Recently, it feels like every time I sit down with my coffee, another study about, well…coffee... seems to be percolating. Not pop-science blog posts, but real research: randomized trials, multiomic microbiome analyses, large-scale epidemiology, even fMRI connectivity studies.
So, in the spirit of sharing what’s been brewing in both my mug and my reading list, here is a synthesized, narrative take on what the science is saying -- with some important caveats:
I am not a doctor or healthcare professional. This essay is certainly not medical advice. I’m simply summarizing & sharing recent studies I’ve been reading and reflecting on them as a fascinated, research-loving coffee drinker.
With that said, let’s dive in.
Coffee is not merely caffeine suspended in water. It’s a complex mixture of chlorogenic acids, polyphenols, minerals, diterpenes, volatile aromatics, and compounds with names that sound like they were dreamed up in a biotech incubator. No surprise, then, that it interacts with multiple physiological systems, including the brain, heart, microbiome, metabolism, aging pathways, all at once.
The more I read, the clearer it becomes: coffee is less of a drink and more like an ecosystem.
Let’s start with the most “Wait, what?” study I’ve come across in a while.
Researchers publishing in Nature Microbiology recently discovered a striking, reproducible association between coffee consumption and the gut bacterium Lawsonibacter asaccharolyticus. Across more than 22,000 participants in the U.S. and U.K., plus public data from 211 global cohorts, coffee drinkers had about four times more of this microbe.
Even better: when scientists isolated L. asaccharolyticus and literally fed it coffee in vitro, the bacterium grew like it had just been handed a promotion and a corner office.
What makes this meaningful?
Because it’s direct evidence that a specific food can shape a specific microbe -- at population scale. And since gut bacteria influence metabolism, inflammation, and possibly numerous disease pathways, understanding this relationship could illuminate how coffee exerts some of its health effects.
A global snapshot even showed higher prevalence of this bacterium in high-coffee countries (Denmark, Luxembourg, Sweden) and almost none in low-coffee nations (China, Argentina, India). It’s as if certain microbes are quietly lobbying for higher national caffeine quotas.
This is the part of microbiome science that amazes me: you drink La Colombe in the morning, and somewhere in your gut, a specific bacterium quietly throws a party.
For years, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been told to avoid caffeine. The logic seemed simple: caffeine is stimulating, stimulation is bad for arrhythmias, therefore coffee equals danger.
But the DECAF trial, presented in 2025 at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, challenges that logic with the scientific equivalent of a raised eyebrow.
Here’s the setup:
Six months later?
➡️ Coffee drinkers had a 39% lower risk of AF or flutter recurrence (HR ~0.61).
Not a mild trend -- a meaningful, clinically relevant difference.
Importantly, participants weren’t quaffing triple espressos. They were drinking one daily cup. And adverse events didn’t differ between groups.
To be fair, the researchers emphasize limitations: self-reported intake, unmeasured lifestyle factors, and the fact that participants were people who already tolerated coffee. This does not mean coffee is now a treatment for AF. But it does mean the old blanket rule, “Caffeine = bad for arrhythmias,” may be overly simplistic.
At minimum, the DECAF data suggest that abstinence is not automatically safer than moderate consumption for those who already drink coffee.
As someone who relies on coffee to kickstart my morning cognitive engine, I was thrilled, but not entirely surprised, by an fMRI study from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.
Researchers scanned the brains of habitual coffee drinkers at rest, both before and after consuming either:
Both drinks produced a decrease in functional connectivity of the brain’s default mode network (DMN), which usually dominates during internal reflection and mind-wandering.
Translation: caffeine, whether in coffee or plain water, nudged the brain from “idle introspection” toward “ready for action.”
But only coffee, not caffeine alone, boosted connectivity in:
These regions support working memory, cognitive control, and goal-directed behavior.
In short:
➡️ Caffeine wakes you up. Coffee makes you more ready to actually do something.
The authors suggest aroma, flavor, and the psychological expectation of drinking coffee may enhance the neural response. Which makes sense. Your brain notices the difference between “cup of coffee” and “cup of hot water spiked with caffeine like a bad prank.”
This study also validated something I’d long felt but couldn’t articulate: the experience of drinking coffee is not just a biochemical event. It’s sensory, psychological, and preparatory.
A large pooled analysis of three major U.S. cohort studies (150,000+ people) asked a simple question: do sugar, artificial sweeteners, cream, or nondairy whiteners change coffee’s relationship with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk?
The answer: yes -- and in important ways.
Key findings:
Most strikingly:
➡️ Coffee containing both sugar and artificial sweeteners offered no significant protection.
This didn’t evaluate honey specifically, but it did reinforce a broader principle: the more we alter coffee from its natural state, the more its potential metabolic benefits seem to diminish.
As someone who abandoned the milk-sugar combo in favor of honey, I’ll admit: part of me read this and thought, “Okay, maybe my taste shift wasn’t just aesthetic.”
Coffee’s relationship with cancer risk is one of the most studied, and complex, topics in nutrition epidemiology.
Recent pooled analyses have demonstrated:
At the same time:
One widely discussed study from Annals of Internal Medicine even suggested lower all-cause mortality among moderate coffee drinkers -- including some who added sugar.
Experts in the UK were quick to temper enthusiasm, noting:
The consensus from critics was sensible:
➡️ Coffee isn’t harmful, and may be modestly beneficial -- but don’t overhaul your lifestyle based on observational mortality curves.
In one of the more intriguing niche studies, researchers examined coffee intake among people with severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder with psychosis).
They found:
This doesn’t prove causality, but it does echo a theme seen across other research:
➡️ Moderation may be coffee’s sweet spot for long-term health markers.
If there's one thing I’ve learned from reading dozens of coffee studies over cups of La Colombe, it’s this:
Coffee is not a simple beverage. It’s not simply “good” or “bad.” It’s a complex, bioactive, ritual-driven, culturally embedded companion in a cup.
Some consistent themes do emerge:
As for me, I’ll keep drinking my French-press La Colombe with honey, keep browsing the medical literature with curiosity, and keep appreciating the small, daily ritual that makes my mornings feel grounded and intentional.
The science will keep evolving -- and you can bet I’ll be reading it with a mug in hand.
